Prospective Evaluation of Sorafenib Combined with Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Adult Core-Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Phase II Trial

Objective Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) includes AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) chromosomal rearrangements, leading to the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11 fusion genes, respectively. Although CBF-AML is considered to have a favorable prognosis relative to other AML subtypes, up to 40% of these patients experience relapse. Recent studies demonstrate achievement of complete molecular remission (CMR) at the end of treatment significantly associated with a reduced risk of relapse. A high frequency of mutations and/or high expression of KIT gene is observed in CBF-AML. Sorafenib is a first-generation type-II multitargeted tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor (TKI) that suppresses various signaling pathways associated with the development of AML, such as RTK (FLT3, c-KIT). Thus the purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sorafenib combined with chemotherapy in adult newly diagnosed CBF-AML.

Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to control group (chemotherapy alone) or sorafenib group (sorafenib combined with chemotherapy). For control group, patients received one cycle of induction therapy with idarubicin (12 mg/m² on days 1-3) plus cytarabine (100 mg/m² on days 1-7), followed by one cycle of idarubicin (8 mg/m² on days 1-3) plus cytarabine (2 g/m² q12h on days 1-3) and two cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy (2 g/m² q12h on days 1-3). For sorafenib group, patients were treated with chemotherapy plus sorafenib at 400 mg twice daily on days 8-21 for induction cycle, and on days 1-21 for each consolidation, and as maintenance for 12 months. Allogeneic or autologous HSCT were implemented based on the measurable residual disease (MRD) level and donor availability after 4 cycles of therapy. MRD levels were serially monitored for RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 transcripts by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results were expressed as a [fusion gene/ABL1] ×100 transcript ratio. Major molecular response (MMR) and complete molecular remission (CMR) are defined as transcript ratio < 0.1% and 0.001%, respectively. The primary endpoint was CMR after 4 cycles of therapy in bone marrow (BM).

Results Between January 2020 and March 2022, 64 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to sorafenib group (n=32) or control group (n=32). There is no significant difference between the two groups about age, gender, CBF subtype, BM blast percentage, additional chromosome abnormalities and gene mutations at diagnosis. The hematological complete remission in the sorafenib and control group were 96.9% and 94.1%, respectively (p=.592). Following three cycles of therapy, MMR was observed in 79.3% of the sorafenib group and 46.9% of the control group (p =.009). Sorafenib group also had a significantly higher CMR than control group (62.1% vs 28.1%, p =.009). After four cycles of therapy, MMR increased to 100% in the sorafenib group and 70.8% in the control group (p =.019), whileCMR was also more frequently achieved in the sorafenib group than that in the control group (90.9% vs 54.2%, p =.006). There was no significant difference of grades 3-4 adverse events between the two groups. Grade 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count less than 0.5×10⁹ cells per L) and thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 20×10⁹ per L) were observed in all cases. The median duration of neutropenia was 12d (range, 6-25d) in the sorafenib group and 10d (range, 5-22d) in the control group (p =.063) , while the median duration of thrombocytopenia was 12d (range, 5-33d) and 9d (range, 6-19d) (p =.052), respectively.The most common grade 3-4 non-hematological adverse events in sorafenib and control group were pneumonia (31.3% vs 57.4%, p=.019), mucositis (21.9% vs 24.1%, p =.816), blood stream infection (37.5% vs 31.5%, p =.568).

Conclusion Sorafenib combined with chemotherapy significantly increased the CMR after 4 cycles of therapy, however, the incidence of haematological and non-haematological adverse events did not apparently increased. The impact of sorafenib combined with chemotherapy on relapse and survival of CBF-AML need further following-up.

Keywords: Sorafenib, CBF-AML, CMR, adverse events

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.